Oh No, I've been banned by a Wrestling Forum

I dared to respond to thread about Chris Benoit. I was then insulted

Actually, to be honest, I'm annoyed that I'm annoyed, but fuck it. Internet Forums are poisoned places where people like to hate because, unlike some of us, they haven't got the balls to tell people they fucking suck in real life.    

This is what happened.

[QUOTE=Evolution;12016560]Are you serious? The thread was clearly to be about his RING ABILITY and him as a wrestler and you didn't offer any opinion on any of it and went straight to the topic that the OP ASKED SPECIFICALLY not to bring up, then you go ahead and say "this thread will turn into blah blah blah" when it's YOU that's making the thread about that.

Fuck off.

[/QUOTE]

I'm aware that this thread is about his ring ability. I'm not a fucking moron.

The OP is a new poster. I was simply making the point that a lot of people on here can't see past that fact that Chris Benoit was one of the greatest in the ring, despite his last 72 hours, hence the words

"Lots of people on here can't separate the last 72 hours of his life from everything else he did"

I am a huge Benoit fan, as I have made clear many times on this forum and was just pointing out that generally on WF, if you praise Chris Benoit, you get a fuckload of abuse (as I have received before)

Actually, why am I defending myself? If you can't read and interpret, then fuck you.

I'm sick of that on here. The amount of fucking testosterone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they want to rape your mother and kill your dog. Don't be so fucking aggressive, because all you do is irritate people like me who just want to discuss wrestling. I don't fucking care who you like, who you hate, where you live, what you do, who you listen to, what you watch on TV, what you don't watch, what you read, who you fuck, who you want to fuck. That goes for anyone with any fucking username on this or any forum.

If you can't be bothered to read what people say and instead just want to assume what people have said then fuck you, and fuck everyone with your attitude

That's the problem with this fucking world. People don't want to listen, and be challenged and maybe learn something. They just want to coast by assuming what people have said because it's fucking easier. They are the sort of people who come up with sarcastic comments to a man telling the truth because they don't know how to have their own opinions. It's also the line of thinking that lands us in wars and sends the more meat-headed of our generation to risk their lives in pointless conflicts. 

Learn to disagree motherfuckers.

If you agree with me, then cool, let's chat. if you don't, then cool as well, let's chat about why we don't agree. Just be aware that I will probably ask you why you don't agree. If you want to reply with a load of abuse then fuck you as a human being and pity your education, which clearly didn't teach you how to debate and put your case in a positive way. I can't be bothered with cunts who don't understand a conversation. All I want is a discussion, on a discussion forum.

Rant over,

Cue the butt hurt comments,

Actually, fuck you as well. Fuck you for not understanding that people can be upset by anything in life, and they have right to say so. Fuck you for not understanding that. Fuck you for not wanting to understand that some of us bash our heads against a fucking wall trying to make ourselves heard and fail because other people don't know how to react to someone who sees ignorance for the cancer that it is. Fuck you for laughing. Fuck you for not realising that it's people like us that will actually save you from the totalitarian cock you are happily sucking and the poisoned cum that you are swallowing.

Take an opinion for what it is, agree of disagree, just dispense with the personal abuse. Just because you're on the internet doesn't mean you have to be a cunt.

"So may fears, so many prophesies, what we need now is a change of ideas"

WWE, Fantasy Booking, The Streak, The Undertaker, Triple H, The Heartbreak Kid Shawn Michaels and everything else - Holy Shit E.C.W. E.C.W.

Onto another of my interests. Yes, Professional Wrestling.

I have my own finishing move. It's called the Original Sin. It can be technically described as a Running Tilt-a-Whirl Sit-out Powerbomb. Effective and very violent looking

Anyway, I wish to talk about The Undertaker

To confirm, I love The Undertaker. I feel as a character he is amazing, and I think he is one of the most athletic “big men” at a true technically gifted wrestler. He may be getting old, but that's fine, he can still put a match on. I'm also a massive fan of Triple H. Not so much of Shawn Michael (Backstage Tosspot, refused to drop titles to anyone, broke his back, claimed Jesus cured it)

Anyway, entering Wrestlemania 28, he is going to wrestle Triple H, in a Hell in a Cell, with Shawn Michaels as Guest Referee.

If you've read this blog this far, I'm guessing you're a wrestling fan, so I'm not going to explain the whole DX thing. I also won't explain The Undertaker's streak at Wrestlemania, as you will already know.

Anyway. I was hoping this match wasn't going to have a guest referee, but it's got one now. I'm hoping the WWE do the right thing. Triple H cannot win this match. It would be an abomination.

Don't get me wrong, the Streak does have to end, but not now. The way I see it, Taker wins this match, but HHH wins a match at a PPV fairly soon. Taker goes into hiding. Meanwhile, HHH builds up a contender, someone who he thinks can take it to the Deadman, he holds matches making it initially not making it clear why. These matches go on for a few months, and eventually a foursome of contenders appear, a "veteran" (At The Moment - Orton), 2 middle to big carders (ATM - Barrett and Ziggler) and someone quite low but with potential (can't think of anyone specific, but in my opinion, Heath Slater).

These guys have matches on and off for a while until late in the year, when HHH announces that "I will name a man to challenge the Undertaker at WM29" (welcome to the fantasy booking aspect) “He will do what I couldn't do, put the undertaker away at Wrestlemania” There is a tournament type thing in which Orton beats Slater (very hard fought) and Barrett beats Ziggler. HHH calls a match at the rumble between Orton and Barrett, with the stipulation that the winner challenges the Undertaker. Barrett wins the match and faces The Undertaker at Wrestlemania 29. The match is set for a proper match (i.e. no stipulation, one on one) and The Undertaker wins. Barrett is furious. Thinking he should have won, and vows at Wrestlemania 30, he will get his revenge. This builds throughout the year, with Taker taking the HHH role from this time round (I'm not going to fight you) Then Barrett forces him to do it, and Undertaker accepts a Buried Alive match.

Barrett Wins, in a proper main event at Wrestlemania and the Undertaker is Buried Alive.

That way. Undertaker gives the rub to someone worthwhile (insert your own wrestlers, these were my preferences) at Wrestlemania and in wrestling tradition, loses his last match. A glittering career ending in the right way, passing the torch. Into the bargin, Barrett (or whoever they use) looks better than HHH, who he can then beat at another PPV and is given the push of his life and is a genuine main event wrestler and the biggest heel in the company.

I guess what I'm saying is Please God, don't give it to HHH. It would be totally wrong. HHH doesn't need it and if he takes it, it's just feeding his ego. If HHH beats Undertaker at Wrestlemania, we'll have to resort to calling him Triple Nash.